Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A11 Bionic vs Unisoc T8200

A
25Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T8200
—Inno Score
28.6CPU28
25.6GPU25.8
20AIspec-based—
20Efficiencyspec-based36
2 spec wins — Apple A11 Bionic3 spec wins — Unisoc T8200

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T8200 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A11 Bionic

  • 179% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 891 vs 319

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T8200

  • 40% lower process: 6 nm vs 10 nm
  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Unisoc T8200
SpecApple A11 BionicUnisoc T8200
Announced20172025
Process10 nm6 nm+40%
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Unisoc T8200
SpecApple A11 BionicUnisoc T8200
Cores68+33%
Core configuration2x2.39 GHz Monsoon + 4x Mistral2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.39 GHz+4%2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Unisoc T8200
SpecApple A11 BionicUnisoc T8200
GPUApple GPU (3-core)Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

AI

AI comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Unisoc T8200
SpecApple A11 BionicUnisoc T8200
NPUNeural Engine (2-core)—
AI performance1 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Unisoc T8200
SpecApple A11 BionicUnisoc T8200
Memory typeLPDDR4XLPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Unisoc T8200
SpecApple A11 BionicUnisoc T8200
ModemQualcomm MDM9655 or Intel XMM 7480 LTE (external)Integrated 5G (SA/NSA)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6 (1x1, optional)
Bluetooth5.05.4

Media

Media comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Unisoc T8200
SpecApple A11 BionicUnisoc T8200
Max display2436x1125FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K@60fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Unisoc T8200
SpecApple A11 BionicUnisoc T8200
Geekbench 6 (single)1,100Top 43%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,245Bottom 40%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme891+179%Bottom 31%319Bottom 10%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup