Apple A13 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200
34.7CPU39.3
34.3GPU35.5
52.2Benchmarks57.3
24.9AI—
41.8Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Apple A13 Bionic8 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 38.2, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+25) and benchmarks (+5). Apple A13 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A13 Bionic
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 35
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 52
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 42
- 43% lower process: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019 | 2022 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.65 GHz Lightning + 4x1.8 GHz Thunder | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.65 GHz | 2.8 GHz+6% |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Neural Engine (8-core) | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 6 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Intel XMM 7660 LTE (external) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | Retina XDR | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 900,000Top 36% | 1,100,000+22%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340Top 34% | 1,600+19%Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,400Top 36% | 4,150+22%Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,950Top 56% | 2,100+8%Top 51% |
Related comparisons
Apple A13 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 1080VSApple A13 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2VSApple A13 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870VSApple A13 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS
