Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400
46CPU51.7
35.1GPU49.4
53.6Benchmarks71.2
41.1AI—
63.2Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic8 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 46.9, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+18) and GPU (+14). Apple A14 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 46
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 35
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 54
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 63
- 102% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 950,000
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2023 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 950,000Top 34% | 1,914,857+102%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080Top 17% | 2,150+3%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900Top 23% | 6,600+35%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050Top 53% | 3,800+85%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

