Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9611
46CPU21.6
35.1GPU—
53.6Benchmarks20
41.1AI—
63.2Efficiency44.2
7 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A14 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.9 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+34) and CPU (+24). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 54 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 63 vs 44
- 494% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,080 vs 350
- 342% higher AnTuTu 10: 950,000 vs 215,000
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 17% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 6 W
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2019 |
| Process | 5 nm+50% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | 5 W+17% |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz+30% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s+129% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 950,000+342%Top 34% | 215,000Top 93% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080+494%Top 17% | 350Top 89% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900+292%Top 23% | 1,250Top 90% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050Top 53% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VS
