Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9611
46CPU21.6
35.1GPU—
53.6Benchmarks26.8
41.1AIspec-based—
63.2Efficiencyspec-based44.2
6 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A14 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.9 to 28.4, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+27) and CPU (+24). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 54 vs 27
- 494% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,080 vs 350
- 292% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,900 vs 1,250
- 129% higher Max bandwidth: 34.1 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 17% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 6 W
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2019 |
| Process | 5 nm+50% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | 5 W+17% |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz+30% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s+129% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 950,000 | 327,561Bottom 4% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 137,937Bottom 4% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 27,554Bottom 4% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 81,576Bottom 5% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 80,494Bottom 4% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080+494%Top 15% | 350Bottom 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900+292%Top 22% | 1,250Bottom 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050Top 34% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Huawei Kirin 980VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G96VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Huawei Kirin 8020VS

