Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200
49.1CPU34.3
36.5GPU31
50.3Benchmarks48.7
50.7AI0
60.7Efficiency66.5
6 spec wins — Apple A15 Bionic3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A15 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 48.1 to 41.9, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+51) and CPU (+15). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A15 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 49 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 37 vs 31
- 45% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,320 vs 1,600
- 36% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 5,650 vs 4,150
- 26% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,650 vs 2,100
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 61
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
General
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2022 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.5 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.24 GHz + 4x2.01 GHz | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.24 GHz+16% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4/5-core) | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 16 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X60) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,150,000+5% | 1,100,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,320+45% | 1,600 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,650+36% | 4,150 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,650+26% | 2,100 |
Related comparisons
Apple A15 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1VSApple A15 Bionicvs Google Tensor G4VSApple A15 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSApple A15 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Google Tensor G3VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VS

