Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400
51CPU51.7
40GPU49.4
58.4Benchmarks71.2
50.7AI—
60.7Efficiency66.5
3 spec wins — Apple A15 Bionic6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 51.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+13) and GPU (+9). Apple A15 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A15 Bionic
- 22% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 40
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 58
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 61
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
- 67% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 1,150,000
General
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2023 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.5 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.24 GHz + 4x2.01 GHz | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.24 GHz+1% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4/5-core) | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 16 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X60) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,150,000Top 26% | 1,914,857+67%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,320+8%Top 12% | 2,150Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,650Top 19% | 6,600+17%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,650Top 41% | 3,800+43%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Apple A15 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSApple A15 Bionicvs Google Tensor G4VSApple A15 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSApple A15 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

