Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2500
56.5CPU57.9
41GPU54
54.8Benchmarks73.1
52.7AI85.9
71.4Efficiency79.6
3 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic7 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66 to 54.1, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+33) and benchmarks (+18). Apple A16 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- 14% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 2,300
- 12% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 41
- Stronger benchmarks score: 73 vs 55
- Stronger AI score: 86 vs 53
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 71
- 247% higher AI performance: 59 TOPS vs 17 TOPS
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+12% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+5% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | 59 TOPS+247% |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000 | 2,150,000+65% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+14% | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570 | 8,200+25% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100 | 4,400+42% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

