Apple A19 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
74.3CPU51.7
56.3GPU49.4
73Benchmarks71.2
82.1Efficiency66.5
8 spec wins — Apple A191 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A19 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 70.3 to 57.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+23) and efficiency (+16). Samsung Exynos 2400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A19
- Stronger CPU score: 74 vs 52
- Stronger GPU score: 56 vs 49
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 67
- 67% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,600 vs 2,150
- 34% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,850 vs 6,600
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A19 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A19 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x4.26 GHz performance + 4x2.6 GHz efficiency | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 4.26 GHz+33% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A19 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A19 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Neural Engine (16-core) | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A19 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 60 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A19 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X71 5G (external) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A19 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | Super Retina XDR | — |
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A19 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 2,050,000+7%Top 10% | 1,914,857Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,600+67%Top 4% | 2,150Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,850+34%Top 7% | 6,600Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,650+22%Top 12% | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Apple A19vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSApple A19vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400+VSApple A19vs Apple A18 ProVSApple A19vs Apple A19 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS
