Apple A20 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2500
93.9CPU57.2
83.1GPU54.3
86.2Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
100Efficiencyspec-based79.6
7 spec wins — Apple A20 Pro1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A20 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 90.2 to 66.1, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+37) and GPU (+29). Samsung Exynos 2500 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A20 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 94 vs 57
- Stronger GPU score: 83 vs 54
- Stronger benchmarks score: 86 vs 74
- 105% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 4,725 vs 2,300
- 80% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,931 vs 4,400
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2025 |
| Process | 2 nm+33% | 3 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | ARM | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x4.93 GHz + 4x2.64 GHz | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 4.93 GHz+49% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (7-core, Neural Accelerators) | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Dual 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Apple C2) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K HDR | — |
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 3,463,072+61% | 2,150,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 4,725+105%Top 1% | 2,300Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 12,575+53%Top 3% | 8,200Top 11% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,931+80%Top 3% | 4,400Top 20% |
Related comparisons
Apple A20 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9600 ProVSApple A20 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSApple A20 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSApple A20 Provs Samsung Exynos 2600VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVS

