Google Tensor G4 vs Huawei Kirin 9000S
45.1CPU32
43.1GPU31.3
56.1Benchmarks46.6
71.4Efficiency34.5
9 spec wins — Google Tensor G40 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G4 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 51.4 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+37) and CPU (+13). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- Stronger CPU score: 45 vs 32
- Stronger GPU score: 43 vs 31
- Stronger benchmarks score: 56 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 35
- 100% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,600 vs 1,300
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm+43% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+18% | 2.62 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Maleoon 910 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz+25% | 750 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000+46%Top 29% | 720,000Top 46% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,950+86%Top 21% | 1,050Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,700+42%Top 24% | 3,300Top 38% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,600+100%Top 42% | 1,300Top 68% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS

