Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
55CPU57.2
45.7GPU54.3
60.5Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
82.1Efficiency79.6
2 spec wins — Google Tensor G54 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 58.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+14) and GPU (+9). Google Tensor G5 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- 15% higher Max clock: 3.78 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- 12% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 46
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 61
- 72% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,150,000 vs 1,250,000
- 32% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 6,200
- 31% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 3,350
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2025 |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+12% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+15% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000Top 25% | 2,150,000+72%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300Top 12% | 2,300Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200Top 18% | 8,200+32%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350Top 33% | 4,400+31%Top 17% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

