Google Tensor G6 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
63.3CPU39.3
53.8GPU35.5
72.3Benchmarks57.3
84Efficiencyspec-based66.5
7 spec wins — Google Tensor G61 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G6 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 46.8, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+24) and GPU (+18). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G6
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 72 vs 57
- 82% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 7,535 vs 4,150
- 81% higher AnTuTu: 1,994,033 vs 1,100,000
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- 14% higher cores: 8 vs 7
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2022 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 7 | 8+14% |
| Core configuration | 1x4.1 GHz ARM C1-Ultra + 4x3.4 GHz ARM C1-Pro + 2x2.65 GHz ARM C1-Pro | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 4.1 GHz+46% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| GPU clock | 1,286 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,994,033+81% | 1,100,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,724+70%Top 13% | 1,600Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,535+82%Top 14% | 4,150Top 35% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,420+63%Top 34% | 2,100Bottom 49% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G6vs Samsung Exynos 2500VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18 ProVSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

