Google Tensor G6 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
63.3CPU51.7
53.8GPU49.4
72.3Benchmarks71.2
84Efficiencyspec-based66.5
5 spec wins — Google Tensor G62 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G6 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 57.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+12) and GPU (+4). Samsung Exynos 2400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G6
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 52
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 49
- 28% higher Max clock: 4.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
- 27% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,724 vs 2,150
- 25% lower process: 3 nm vs 4 nm
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- 43% higher cores: 10 vs 7
- 11% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 3,420
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 7 | 10+43% |
| Core configuration | 1x4.1 GHz ARM C1-Ultra + 4x3.4 GHz ARM C1-Pro + 2x2.65 GHz ARM C1-Pro | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 4.1 GHz+28% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 1,286 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,994,033 | 1,914,857Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 45% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 34% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,724+27%Top 12% | 2,150Top 18% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,535+14%Top 13% | 6,600Top 17% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,420Top 35% | 3,800+11%Top 25% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G6vs Samsung Exynos 2500VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18 ProVSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS

