Skip to content
InnoReviews

Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 1610

Google Tensor
41.2Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
34.9CPU30.7
35.5GPU—
45.2Benchmarks—
58.3Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — Google Tensor1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Google Tensor

  • Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 31
  • 17% higher Max clock: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 1610
Announced20212026
Process5 nm—
TDP (typical)8 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2.8 GHz+17%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G78 MP20Mali-G68
GPU clock848 MHz—

AI

AI comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 1610
NPUGoogle Edge TPU—

Memory

Memory comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR5—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 1610
ModemExternal (Samsung Exynos 5123)—
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.3

Media

Media comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 1610
Video capture4K@60fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Google Tensor versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecGoogle TensorSamsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu680,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,340Top 38%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,150Top 47%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,700Bottom 40%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup