Google Tensor vs Unisoc Tiger T820
34.9CPU27
35.5GPU—
45.2Benchmarks35.9
58.3Efficiency52.5
5 spec wins — Google Tensor2 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor wins this mobile chipset face-off, 41.2 to 35.6, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+9) and CPU (+8). Unisoc Tiger T820 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 45 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 58 vs 53
- 94% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,340 vs 690
- 45% higher AnTuTu 10: 680,000 vs 470,000
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
- 25% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 8 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2023 |
| Process | 5 nm+17% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 6 W+25% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+4% | 2.7 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000+45%Top 49% | 470,000Top 63% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340+94%Top 34% | 690Top 75% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150+40%Top 42% | 2,250Top 59% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700Top 60% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS