Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 850

Huawei Kirin 710A
—Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 850
26.2Inno Score
20CPU20
—Benchmarks20
20Efficiencyspec-based46.7
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 710A1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 850

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 710A lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 710A

  • 95% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 1,172 vs 600
  • 90% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 323 vs 170

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 850

  • 43% lower process: 8 nm vs 14 nm

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 710A versus Samsung Exynos 850
SpecHuawei Kirin 710ASamsung Exynos 850
Announced20202020
Process14 nm8 nm+43%
TDP (typical)—4 W
ArchitectureArmv8Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 710A versus Samsung Exynos 850
SpecHuawei Kirin 710ASamsung Exynos 850
Cores88
Core configuration4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A538x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2 GHz2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 710A versus Samsung Exynos 850
SpecHuawei Kirin 710ASamsung Exynos 850
GPUArm Mali-G51 MP4Arm Mali-G52 MP1

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 710A versus Samsung Exynos 850
SpecHuawei Kirin 710ASamsung Exynos 850
Memory type—LPDDR4X-1600
Max bandwidth—12.8 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 710A versus Samsung Exynos 850
SpecHuawei Kirin 710ASamsung Exynos 850
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-7
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.0

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 710A versus Samsung Exynos 850
SpecHuawei Kirin 710ASamsung Exynos 850
Max display—FHD+ @ 60Hz
Video capture—1080p@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 710A versus Samsung Exynos 850
SpecHuawei Kirin 710ASamsung Exynos 850
AnTuTu—180,000
Geekbench 6 (single)323+90%Bottom 8%170Bottom 4%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,172+95%Bottom 8%600Bottom 3%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup