Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020

H
—Inno Score
VS
MediaTek Dimensity 6020
21.8Inno Score
30.7CPU23.4
—GPU21
20Efficiencyspec-based20
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80000 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 6020

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 23

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 6020

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 6020
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 6020
Announced20232023
Process7 nm7 nm
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 6020
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 6020
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+9%2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 6020
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 6020
GPU—Arm Mali-G57 MC2

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 6020
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 6020
Memory type—LPDDR4X-4266

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 6020
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 6020
Modem—Integrated 5G modem
Max download—2.8 Gbps
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.1

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 6020
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 6020
Max display—FHD+ @ 90Hz (120Hz optional)
Video capture—2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 6020
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 6020
Geekbench 6 (single)—709Bottom 26%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,781Bottom 22%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—322Bottom 11%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup