Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7450

H
—Inno Score
VS
MediaTek Dimensity 7450
—Inno Score
30.7CPU36
20Efficiencyspec-based68
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80003 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 7450

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 and MediaTek Dimensity 7450 lack the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 7450

  • Stronger CPU score: 36 vs 31
  • 43% lower process: 4 nm vs 7 nm

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7450
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7450
Announced20232026
Process7 nm4 nm+43%
Architecture—Armv8.2-A

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7450
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7450
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz2.6 GHz+8%

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7450
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7450
GPU—Arm Mali-G615 MC2

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7450
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7450
NPU—MediaTek NPU (6th gen)

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7450
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7450
Memory type—LPDDR5-6400 / LPDDR4X

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7450
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7450
Modem—Integrated 5G modem (3GPP R17)
Max download—3.3 Gbps
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth—5.4

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus MediaTek Dimensity 7450
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000MediaTek Dimensity 7450
Max display—WFHD+ @ 120Hz / FHD+ @ 144Hz
Video capture—4K@30fps

Related comparisons

Try another matchup