Huawei Kirin 8020 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
34.1CPU51.7
25.6GPU49.4
—Benchmarks71.2
20Efficiencyspec-based66.5
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80206 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 28, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+24) and CPU (+18). Huawei Kirin 8020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8020
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 26
- 331% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 882
- 67% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 1,288
- 58% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,600 vs 4,166
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | ARM (64-bit, custom HiSilicon cores) | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | — | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.28 GHz | 3.2 GHz+40% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 920c | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,914,857Top 36% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 33% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 36% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 46% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 36% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,288Top 40% | 2,150+67%Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,166Top 34% | 6,600+58%Top 18% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 882Bottom 18% | 3,800+331%Top 25% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 8020vs MediaTek Helio G96VSHuawei Kirin 8020vs MediaTek Helio G95VSHuawei Kirin 8020vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSHuawei Kirin 8020vs MediaTek Helio G90TVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS
