Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 8020 vs Unisoc T765

WINNER
Huawei Kirin 8020
28Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T765
27.4Inno Score
34.1CPU24.5
25.6GPU25.7
20Efficiencyspec-based36
4 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80202 spec wins — Unisoc T765

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Huawei Kirin 8020 scores 28 against 27.4 for Unisoc T765. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Huawei Kirin 8020 edges ahead in CPU, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8020

  • Stronger CPU score: 34 vs 25
  • 188% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 882 vs 306
  • 116% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,166 vs 1,925
  • 75% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,288 vs 736

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T765

  • 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc T765
Announced20252023
Process7 nm6 nm+14%
ArchitectureARM (64-bit, custom HiSilicon cores)Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc T765
Cores88
Core configuration—2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.28 GHz2.3 GHz+1%

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc T765
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 920cArm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc T765
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc T765
ModemIntegrated 5G modem (unannounced)Integrated 5G (SA/NSA), LTE Cat-15 (DL) / Cat-18 (UL)
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.0

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc T765
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Unisoc T765
Geekbench 6 (single)1,288+75%Top 37%736Bottom 27%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,166+116%Top 32%1,925Bottom 25%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme882+188%Bottom 37%306Bottom 12%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup