Huawei Kirin 9000S vs Samsung Exynos 2400
32CPU51.7
31.3GPU49.4
46.6Benchmarks71.2
34.5Efficiency66.5
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S7 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+32) and benchmarks (+25). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 32
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 31
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 35
- 192% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 1,300
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 9 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.62 GHz | 3.2 GHz+22% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 720,000Top 46% | 1,914,857+166%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050Top 44% | 2,150+105%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300Top 38% | 6,600+100%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300Top 68% | 3,800+192%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

