Huawei Kirin 9000S vs Samsung Exynos 2400
24.9CPU50.4
26.1GPU48
33.3Benchmarks64.6
34.5Efficiency66.5
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S7 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 55.6 to 28.7, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+32) and benchmarks (+31). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 50 vs 25
- Stronger GPU score: 48 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 65 vs 33
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 35
- 192% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 1,300
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 9 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.62 GHz | 3.2 GHz+22% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 720,000 | 1,700,000+136% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050 | 2,150+105% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300 | 6,600+100% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300 | 3,800+192% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Google TensorVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS

