Huawei Kirin 9020 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
36.1CPU51.7
36.8GPU49.4
—Benchmarks71.2
20Efficiencyspec-based66.5
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90206 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 32.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+16) and GPU (+13). Huawei Kirin 9020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9020
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 36
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 37
- 99% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 1,907
- 67% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 1,285
- 47% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,600 vs 4,505
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | ARM (in-house HiSilicon cores) | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz HiSilicon Big + 3x2.15 GHz HiSilicon Mid + 4x1.6 GHz HiSilicon Little | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 920 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 840 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,914,857Top 36% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 36% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 47% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 36% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,285Top 40% | 2,150+67%Top 18% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,505Top 29% | 6,600+47%Top 17% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,907Bottom 48% | 3,800+99%Top 25% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9020vs MediaTek Dimensity 7100VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs Unisoc Tiger T760VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS
