Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2500

H
—Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 2500
66.1Inno Score
—CPU57.2
—GPU54.3
—Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
—Efficiencyspec-based79.6
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2500
Announced20262025
Process—3 nm
TDP (typical)—8 W
Architecture—Armv9.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2500
Cores—10
Core configuration—1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520
Max clock—3.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2500
GPU—Samsung Xclipse 950

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2500
NPU—Samsung NPU
AI performance—59 TOPS

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2500
Memory type—LPDDR5X

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2500
Modem—Integrated Exynos 5G modem
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth6.0—

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2500
Video capture4K8K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 2500
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProSamsung Exynos 2500
AnTuTu—2,150,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,300Top 16%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—8,200Top 12%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—4,400Top 20%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup