Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin T92A vs MediaTek MT8189

Huawei Kirin T92A
37.8Inno Score
VS
MediaTek MT8189
—Inno Score
40CPU28.9
28GPU—
60Benchmarks—
20Efficiencyspec-based36
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T92A1 spec wins — MediaTek MT8189

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: MediaTek MT8189 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T92A

  • Stronger CPU score: 40 vs 29
  • 114% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,812 vs 2,249
  • 53% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,517 vs 992

Reasons to pick the MediaTek MT8189

  • 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus MediaTek MT8189
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AMediaTek MT8189
Announced20252025
Process7 nm6 nm+14%
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus MediaTek MT8189
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AMediaTek MT8189
Cores88
Core configuration—2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock—2.6 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus MediaTek MT8189
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AMediaTek MT8189
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 920Arm Mali-G57 MC2

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus MediaTek MT8189
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AMediaTek MT8189
Memory type—LPDDR5-6400

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus MediaTek MT8189
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AMediaTek MT8189
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.2—

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus MediaTek MT8189
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AMediaTek MT8189
Max display—2.5K (1600p)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus MediaTek MT8189
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AMediaTek MT8189
AnTuTu1,225,220Top 48%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)474,825Top 39%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)205,592Top 48%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)276,082Top 37%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)268,721Bottom 50%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,517+53%Top 26%992Bottom 46%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,812+114%Top 22%2,249Bottom 41%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,184Bottom 46%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup