Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

MediaTek Dimensity 6400
26.6Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
26.3CPU30.7
21.3GPU—
36Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 64001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 6400

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 26

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20252026
Process6 nm—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2.5 GHz+4%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Mali-G68

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR4X-4266—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemIntegrated 5G modem (3GPP Release 16)—
Max download3.3 Gbps—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.3

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Samsung Exynos 1610
Max displayFHD+ @ 120Hz—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6400 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6400Samsung Exynos 1610
Geekbench 6 (single)792Bottom 34%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,041Bottom 32%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme356Bottom 6%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup