MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
36.6CPU51.7
33.1GPU49.4
53.6Benchmarks71.2
73.8Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 82007 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 45.6, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+18) and GPU (+16). MediaTek Dimensity 8200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8200
- Stronger efficiency score: 74 vs 67
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 33
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 54
- 111% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 1,800
- 102% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 950,000
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+3% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 580 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 950,000Top 34% | 1,914,857+102%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180Top 37% | 2,150+82%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,750Top 33% | 6,600+76%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800Top 57% | 3,800+111%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Apple A14 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

