MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
45.9CPU57.2
46.1GPU54.3
71.7Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
73.8Efficiency79.6
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 84008 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 56.3, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+11) and GPU (+8). MediaTek Dimensity 8400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- 25% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 46
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 46
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 74
- 59% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 1,450
- 29% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 3,400
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+25% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.25 GHz | 3.3 GHz+2% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G720 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,946,644Top 12% | 2,150,000+10%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,450Top 28% | 2,300+59%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,400Top 16% | 8,200+28%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,400Top 32% | 4,400+29%Top 17% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 560,176Top 32% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 642,040Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 339,619Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 404,809Top 32% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

