MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ vs Samsung Exynos 2400
55.9CPU51.7
56.3GPU49.4
73.5Benchmarks71.2
66.5Efficiency66.5
10 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9300+1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ wins this mobile chipset face-off, 61.7 to 57.9, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+7) and CPU (+4). Samsung Exynos 2400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
- Stronger CPU score: 56 vs 52
- Stronger GPU score: 56 vs 49
- 22% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,650 vs 3,800
- 22% higher AnTuTu 10 (Memory): 352,226 vs 289,405
- 15% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 7,600 vs 6,600
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.4 GHz+6% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 790 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5T-9600 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 2,092,277+9%Top 9% | 1,914,857Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,250+5%Top 14% | 2,150Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,600+15%Top 11% | 6,600Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,650+22%Top 12% | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 643,013+1%Top 23% | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 620,215+10%Top 26% | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 352,226+22%Top 18% | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 476,823+12%Top 23% | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs Apple A17 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSMediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

