MediaTek Dimensity 9600M vs Samsung Exynos 2500
71.8CPU58.4
74.5GPU60.5
86.1Benchmarks—
—AIspec-based85.9
84Efficiencyspec-based79.6
5 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9600M1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 9600M wins this mobile chipset face-off, 77.7 to 66.5, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+14) and CPU (+13). Samsung Exynos 2500 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
- Stronger CPU score: 72 vs 58
- Stronger GPU score: 75 vs 61
- 33% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 6,878 vs 5,166
- 28% higher Max clock: 4.21 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- 26% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,124 vs 2,478
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2025 |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | ARMv9.3-A | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra + 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium + 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 4.21 GHz+28% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G1 Ultra MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 990 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-10667 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G-A modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9600M | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 3,448,843 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,124+26%Top 6% | 2,478Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,509+17%Top 6% | 8,098Top 10% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,878+33%Top 4% | 5,166Top 8% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9600Mvs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSMediaTek Dimensity 9600Mvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSMediaTek Dimensity 9600Mvs Apple A19 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9600Mvs Samsung Exynos 2600VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVS

