MediaTek Helio P35 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
21.6CPU51.7
—GPU49.4
20Benchmarks71.2
46.7Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — MediaTek Helio P357 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 26.9, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+51) and CPU (+30). MediaTek Helio P35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio P35
- 56% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 47
- 1724% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 105,000
- 1383% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 145
General
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018 | 2023 |
| Process | 12 nm | 4 nm+67% |
| TDP (typical) | 4 W+56% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 8x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+39% |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-1600 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | HD+ @ 60Hz | — |
| Video capture | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Helio P35 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 105,000Top 100% | 1,914,857+1724%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 145Top 98% | 2,150+1383%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 520Top 100% | 6,600+1169%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Helio P35vs MediaTek Helio G35VSMediaTek Helio P35vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675VSMediaTek Helio P35vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835VSMediaTek Helio P35vs MediaTek Helio G90TVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS