Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
20CPU51.7
—GPU49.4
20Benchmarks71.2
46.7Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 6627 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+51) and CPU (+32). Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
- 56% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 47
- 682% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 245,000
- 572% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 320
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2023 |
| Process | 11 nm | 4 nm+64% |
| TDP (typical) | 4 W+56% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) + 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+60% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Qualcomm Hexagon 683 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-1866 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 14.9 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X11 LTE | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 60Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 245,000Top 89% | 1,914,857+682%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 320Top 92% | 2,150+572%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,250Top 90% | 6,600+428%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662vs MediaTek Helio G85VSQualcomm Snapdragon 662vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSQualcomm Snapdragon 662vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSQualcomm Snapdragon 662vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS
