Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
25.5CPU51.7
21.3GPU49.4
32.5Benchmarks71.2
54.9Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 6958 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 30.8, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+39) and GPU (+28). Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
- 44% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 26
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 21
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 33
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 55
- 956% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 360
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2023 |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W+44% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz+45% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Hexagon NPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X51 5G | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 2.5 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | 1080p@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 411,000Top 71% | 1,914,857+366%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 906Top 60% | 2,150+137%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,013Top 67% | 6,600+228%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 360Top 98% | 3,800+956%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695vs Samsung Exynos 990VSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS
