Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Unisoc Tiger T820
39.3CPU27
35.5GPU—
57.3Benchmarks35.9
66.5Efficiency52.5
5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 22002 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.8 to 35.6, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+21) and efficiency (+14). Unisoc Tiger T820 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- Stronger CPU score: 39 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 57 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 53
- 134% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,100,000 vs 470,000
- 132% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,600 vs 690
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm+33% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 6 W+33% |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+4% | 2.7 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,100,000+134%Top 28% | 470,000Top 63% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,600+132%Top 27% | 690Top 75% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,150+84%Top 30% | 2,250Top 59% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,100Top 51% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS