Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
51.7CPU20
49.4GPU—
71.2Benchmarks20
66.5Efficiency46.7
7 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 24001 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+51) and CPU (+32). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 47
- 666% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 250,000
- 412% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 420
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- 56% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+67% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 4 W+56% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.2 GHz+78% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,914,857+666%Top 12% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,150+412%Top 16% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,600+340%Top 15% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 637,914Top 26% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 562,338Top 29% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 289,405Top 40% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 425,200Top 29% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS