Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Unisoc Tiger T820
72.6CPU27
77.4GPU—
81.1Benchmarks35.9
100Efficiencyspec-based52.5
5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 26000 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 35.6, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+46) and benchmarks (+45). Unisoc Tiger T820 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 36
- 381% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 2,250
- 334% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,995 vs 690
- 67% lower process: 2 nm vs 6 nm
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2023 |
| Process | 2 nm+67% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 6 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | — | 2.7 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | — | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,827,538Top 12% | 470,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 947,776Top 9% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 1,052,625Top 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 347,409Top 23% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 479,728Top 25% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,995+334%Top 9% | 690Top 77% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,824+381%Top 4% | 2,250Top 61% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,230Top 7% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS