Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Xiaomi XRING O1
72.6CPU66.2
77.4GPU69.9
81.1Benchmarks—
—AIspec-based78.1
100Efficiencyspec-based84
5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 26000 spec wins — Xiaomi XRING O1
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 72.2, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+8) and CPU (+6). Xiaomi XRING O1 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 66
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 70
- 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm
- 21% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 8,970
- 15% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 6,311
Reasons to pick the Xiaomi XRING O1
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2025 |
| Process | 2 nm+33% | 3 nm |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Core configuration | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) | 2x3.9 GHz Cortex-X925 + 4x3.4 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.9 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | — | 3.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 960 | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC16 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | Xiaomi NPU (6-core, self-developed) |
| AI performance | — | 44 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5T |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | External (MediaTek T800) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Xiaomi XRING O1 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 2,827,538Top 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 947,776Top 8% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 1,052,625Top 12% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 347,409Top 22% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 479,728Top 27% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,995+7%Top 8% | 2,790Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,824+21%Top 5% | 8,970Top 8% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,230+15%Top 7% | 6,311Top 8% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Xiaomi Xring O3VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSXiaomi XRING O1vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400+VSXiaomi XRING O1vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500sVSXiaomi XRING O1vs Apple A19 ProVSXiaomi XRING O1vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VS

