Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Unisoc T610

WINNER
Samsung Exynos 9611
26.3Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T610
20.6Inno Score
21.6CPU20
—GPU21.6
20Benchmarks—
44.2Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 96113 spec wins — Unisoc T610

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Exynos 9611 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 26.3 to 20.6, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+2). Unisoc T610 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611

  • 28% higher Max clock: 2.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
  • 17% lower process: 10 nm vs 12 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T610

  • 19% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 417 vs 350

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T610
Announced20192021
Process10 nm+17%12 nm
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T610
Cores88
Core configuration4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A532x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.3 GHz+28%1.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T610
GPUArm Mali-G72 MP3Arm Mali-G52 MP2
GPU clock—614 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T610
Memory typeLPDDR4X-1866LPDDR4X-1600 / LPDDR3-933
Max bandwidth14.9 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T610
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-12Integrated LTE Cat-7
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.0

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T610
Max displayFHD+ @ 60HzFHD+ (2400x1080)
Video capture4K@30fps1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 9611 versus Unisoc T610
SpecSamsung Exynos 9611Unisoc T610
AnTuTu215,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)350Bottom 10%417+19%Bottom 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,250Bottom 9%1,361+9%Bottom 13%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—135Bottom 3%

Related comparisons

Samsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Dimensity 6360VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc T610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 1VSUnisoc T610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678VSUnisoc T610vs Unisoc T616VSUnisoc T610vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020VS

Try another matchup