Skip to content
InnoReviews

Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Unisoc T8200

Unisoc Tiger T606
26.2Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T8200
—Inno Score
20CPU28
—GPU55
20Benchmarks—
46.7Efficiencyspec-based36
0 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T6063 spec wins — Unisoc T8200

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T8200 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T606

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T8200

  • Stronger CPU score: 28 vs 20
  • 50% lower process: 6 nm vs 12 nm
  • 44% higher Max clock: 2.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz

General

General comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T8200
Announced20212025
Process12 nm6 nm+50%
TDP (typical)4 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T8200
Cores88
Core configuration2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A552x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock1.6 GHz2.3 GHz+44%

GPU

GPU comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T8200
GPUArm Mali-G57 MP1Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T8200
Memory typeLPDDR4X-1866LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth14.9 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T8200
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-7Integrated 5G (SA/NSA)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6 (1x1, optional)
Bluetooth5.05.4

Media

Media comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T8200
Max displayFHD+ @ 60HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture1080p@30fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Unisoc Tiger T606 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecUnisoc Tiger T606Unisoc T8200
AnTuTu235,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)390Bottom 11%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,400Bottom 14%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup