Skip to content
InnoReviews

Unisoc T620 vs Unisoc Tiger T820

U
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc Tiger T820
35.6Inno Score
25.3CPU27
55GPU—
—Benchmarks35.9
20Efficiencyspec-based52.5
1 spec wins — Unisoc T6202 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T620 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T620

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820

  • 50% lower process: 6 nm vs 12 nm
  • 23% higher Max clock: 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz

General

General comparison: Unisoc T620 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T620Unisoc Tiger T820
Announced20242023
Process12 nm6 nm+50%
TDP (typical)—6 W
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Unisoc T620 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T620Unisoc Tiger T820
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A551x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.2 GHz2.7 GHz+23%

GPU

GPU comparison: Unisoc T620 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T620Unisoc Tiger T820
GPUArm Mali-G57 MP1Arm Mali-G57 MP4
GPU clock850 MHz—

Memory

Memory comparison: Unisoc T620 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T620Unisoc Tiger T820
Memory typeLPDDR4X-1866LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth—17.1 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Unisoc T620 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T620Unisoc Tiger T820
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)Integrated 5G (sub-6)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2

Media

Media comparison: Unisoc T620 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T620Unisoc Tiger T820
Max displayFHD+ @ 90Hz / HD+ @ 120HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture1080p@60fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Unisoc T620 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T620Unisoc Tiger T820
AnTuTu—470,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—690Bottom 23%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,250Bottom 38%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup