Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin XE90 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

Huawei Kirin XE90
—Inno Score
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
66.5Inno Score
—Single-core70.3
—Multi-core60
—Efficiencyspec-based81.4
—iGPU70
—Platformspec-based58.2
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin XE901 spec wins — Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin XE90 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin XE90

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

  • 300% higher Max TDP: 80 W vs 20 W

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Announced20262026
Process—2 nm
Base TDP—25 W
Max TDP20 W80 W+300%

Cores & Clocks

Cores & Clocks comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Cores—16
Performance cores—4
Efficiency cores—12
Threads—16
Base clock—2.1 GHz
Boost clock—4.9 GHz
L3 cache—18 MB

Integrated GPU

Integrated GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
iGPU—Intel Graphics (4 Xe3-cores)
iGPU clock—2,500 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Memory support—LPDDR5X, DDR5
Max memory—128 GB

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin XE90 versus Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
SpecHuawei Kirin XE90Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,876Top 25%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—16,298Top 20%
Cinebench R23 (single)—2,069Top 16%
Cinebench R23 (multi)—19,307Top 18%
PassMark—36,060Top 18%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (iGPU)—2,846Top 19%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup