Skip to content
InnoReviews

Alienware m16 R2 vs ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

WINNER
Alienware m16 R2
51.5Inno Score
VS
42.1Performance44
49Display37.4
86.7Battery86.7
30.4Portability35.9
4 spec wins — Alienware m16 R21 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Alienware m16 R2 scores 51.5 against 50.3 for ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Alienware m16 R2 edges ahead in display, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Alienware m16 R2

  • Stronger display score: 49 vs 37
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
  • 17% lower thickness: 23.5 mm vs 28.2 mm
  • 10% higher Peak brightness: 300 nits vs 273 nits

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger portability score: 36 vs 30
  • 13% lower weight: 2.27 kg vs 2.61 kg

Display

Display comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS (G-Sync, Advanced Optimus)IPS-level (G-Sync)
Resolution2560x16001920x1200
Refresh rate240 Hz+45%165 Hz
Peak brightness300 nits+10%273 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Core i7-13650HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (RTX 4060 / 4070 optional)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage1,024 GB+100%512 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Geekbench 6 (single)2,383Bottom 18%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)12,670Bottom 42%—

Battery

Battery comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Capacity90 Wh90 Wh
Charging240 W240 W

Design

Design comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Weight2.61 kg2.27 kg+13%
Thickness23.5 mm+17%28.2 mm
MaterialAnodized aluminum lid, soft-touch deckAluminum lid, plastic base

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
PortsThunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort 1.4, 15W PD), USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (DisplayPort 1.4), 2x USB-A 3.2, HDMI 2.1, 2.5GbE RJ-45, microSD, 3.5mm comboThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (Wi-Fi 7 optional)Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.35.2
Webcam1080p + IR720p HD
BiometricsIR face (Windows Hello)None

Software

Software comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup