Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
50.3Inno Score
VS
MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
48.8Inno Score
44Performance47.8
37.4Display41.6
86.7Battery54.2
35.9Portability53.8
1 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6076 spec wins — MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 wins this laptop face-off, 50.3 to 48.8, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+33). MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 54
  • 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz

Reasons to pick the MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio

  • Stronger performance score: 48 vs 44
  • Stronger display score: 42 vs 37
  • Stronger portability score: 54 vs 36
  • 120% higher Peak brightness: 600 nits vs 273 nits
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)OLED (UHD+)
Resolution1920x12003840x2400
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness273 nits600 nits+120%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop
RAM16 GB32 GB+100%
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)LPDDR5X-6400 (soldered)
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,450Bottom 29%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—13,300Bottom 50%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Capacity90 Wh100 Wh+11%
Web browsing endurance—7 h
Charging240 W240 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Weight2.27 kg1.99 kg+12%
Thickness28.2 mm20 mm+29%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseMagnesium-aluminum alloy

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio2x Thunderbolt 4, 1x USB-A 3.2, HDMI 2.1, microSD, 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
Webcam720p HD1080p + IR
BiometricsNoneIR face (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup