Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 vs Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608
56.5Inno Score
VS
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
56.4Inno Score
50Performance42.7
87.6Graphicschip45.1
44.1Displayspec-based50.4
73.3Batteryspec-based69.5
39.8Portabilityspec-based84.7
7 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA6085 spec wins — Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 scores 56.5 against 56.4 for Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x. Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 edges ahead in graphics and performance, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608

  • Stronger performance score: 50 vs 43
  • Stronger graphics score: 88 vs 45
  • 269% higher charging: 240 W vs 65 W
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB

Reasons to pick the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x

  • 108% higher Peak brightness: 1,000 nits vs 480 nits
  • 50% lower thickness: 12.9 mm vs 25.7 mm
  • 42% lower weight: 1.28 kg vs 2.2 kg

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
Screen size16 ″+10%14.5 ″
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, G-Sync (100% sRGB)OLED (PureSight)
Resolution2560x16002944x1840
Refresh rate165 Hz+83%90 Hz
Peak brightness480 nits1,000 nits+108%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 7 260Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-78-100)
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7, 115W)Qualcomm Adreno
RAM32 GB+100%16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB)LPDDR5X-8448
Storage1,024 GB+100%512 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
Geekbench 6 (single)2,673+10%Bottom 35%2,420Bottom 17%
Geekbench 6 (multi)13,299Bottom 48%13,800+4%Top 48%
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU)13,644Top 31%—

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
Capacity90 Wh+29%70 Wh
Web browsing endurance13 h14 h+8%
Charging240 W+269%65 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
Weight2.2 kg1.28 kg+42%
Thickness25.7 mm12.9 mm+50%
MaterialPlastic body with aluminum lidAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, one with G-SYNC and power delivery), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack3x USB4 (USB-C)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
WebcamFHD with IR1080p + IR
BiometricsIR face (Windows Hello)IR face (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608 versus Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2025) FA608Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 (Arm)

Related comparisons

Try another matchup