Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)

VS
HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
54.2Inno Score
43.2chipPerformancespec-basedchip56.8
82.1Graphicschip73
37.4Displayspec-based31.4
86.7Batteryspec-based68
35.9Portabilityspec-based48.3
3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6075 spec wins — HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 scores 54.2 against 54.2 for HP OmniBook X 17 (2026). Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 edges ahead in graphics, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger graphics score: 82 vs 73
  • 140% higher charging: 240 W vs 100 W
  • 18% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 76 Wh

Reasons to pick the HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)

  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 95% higher storage: 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
  • 47% higher Peak brightness: 400 nits vs 273 nits
  • 46% lower thickness: 15.1 mm vs 28.2 mm

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
Screen size16 ″17.3 ″+8%
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)IPS touchscreen
Resolution1920x12001920x1080
Refresh rate165 Hz—
Peak brightness273 nits400 nits+47%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXIntel Core Ultra X7 358H
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopIntel Arc B390 (integrated)
RAM16 GB32 GB+100%
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)LPDDR5X-8533 (onboard)
Storage512 GB1,000 GB+95%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe Gen4 NVMe M.2 SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU)10,397Bottom 22%—

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
Capacity90 Wh+18%76 Wh
Charging240 W+140%100 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
Weight2.27 kg+5%2.39 kg
Thickness28.2 mm15.1 mm+46%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseAluminum (sandblasted anodized cover and keyboard frame)

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio2x Thunderbolt 4 USB-C (40Gbps, USB Power Delivery 3.1, DisplayPort 2.1), 3x USB-A 10Gbps, HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7 (MediaTek MT7925, 2x2)
Bluetooth5.26.0
Webcam720p HD5MP IR camera with HDR auto switch, temporal noise reduction and privacy shutter
BiometricsNoneIR face recognition (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup