ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3M
43.2chipPerformancespec-based52.8
82.1Graphicschip55.6
37.4Displayspec-based26.5
86.7Batteryspec-based55.7
35.9Portabilityspec-based92.1
4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6075 spec wins — MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3M
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 scores 54.2 against 54.1 for MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3M. Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 edges ahead in graphics, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
- Stronger graphics score: 82 vs 56
- 269% higher charging: 240 W vs 65 W
- 175% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
- 67% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 54 Wh
- 20% higher Screen size: 16 ″ vs 13.3 ″
Reasons to pick the MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3M
- 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- 60% lower weight: 0.9 kg vs 2.27 kg
- 46% higher Peak brightness: 398 nits vs 273 nits
- 44% lower thickness: 15.9 mm vs 28.2 mm
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3M |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″+20% | 13.3 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level (G-Sync) | OLED |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 2880x1800 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+175% | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 273 nits | 398 nits+46% |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3M |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core i7-13650HX | Intel Core Ultra 9 386H |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | Intel Graphics (integrated, 4 Xe3 cores) |
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM type | DDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM) | LPDDR5X (soldered) |
| Storage | 512 GB | 1,024 GB+100% |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots) | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,873Top 39% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 13,776Top 50% |
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU) | 10,397Bottom 22% | — |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3M |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 90 Wh+67% | 54 Wh |
| Web browsing endurance | — | 12 h |
| Charging | 240 W+269% | 65 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3M |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 0.9 kg+60% |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 15.9 mm+44% |
| Material | Aluminum lid, plastic base | Magnesium-aluminum alloy |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3M |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | Thunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio | 2x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort, Power Delivery 3.0), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, microSD card reader, 3.5mm combo jack, Kensington lock |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (Intel Killer BE1775) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 6.0 |
| Webcam | 720p HD | 1080p IR with privacy shutter |
| Biometrics | None | Fingerprint reader, IR camera for Windows Hello |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3M |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs ASUS ExpertBook P5 G2 (P5605CAA)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs HP OmniBook X 17 (2026)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 16VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs MECHREVO Wujie 14 MaxVSMSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3Mvs HP ZBook 8 G1as 14VSMSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3Mvs REDMI Book 14 (2026)VSMSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3Mvs Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraVSMSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3Mvs ASUS ExpertBook P5 G2 (P5605CAA)VS