Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max

VS
WINNER
MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
54.3Inno Score
43.2chipPerformancespec-basedchip39.8
82.1Graphicschip59
37.4Displayspec-based38.4
86.7Batteryspec-based62.7
35.9Portabilityspec-based90.4
3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6074 spec wins — MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 scores 54.2 against 54.3 for MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max. Pick by the categories that matter to you, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger graphics score: 82 vs 59
  • 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 25% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 72 Wh
  • 14% higher Screen size: 16 ″ vs 14 ″

Reasons to pick the MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max

  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 83% higher Peak brightness: 500 nits vs 273 nits
  • 56% lower weight: 1 kg vs 2.27 kg
  • 47% lower thickness: 14.9 mm vs 28.2 mm

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
Screen size16 ″+14%14 ″
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)Matte anti-glare (100% sRGB, full-brightness DC dimming)
Resolution1920x12002880x1800
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness273 nits500 nits+83%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXIntel Core Ultra 5 226V
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopIntel Arc Graphics 130V (7 Xe cores, integrated)
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)LPDDR5X-8533 (integrated)
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
3DMark Time Spy Graphics (GPU)10,397Bottom 22%—

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
Capacity90 Wh+25%72 Wh
Charging240 W—

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
Weight2.27 kg1 kg+56%
Thickness28.2 mm14.9 mm+47%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseFull magnesium alloy chassis

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio2x Thunderbolt 4, 3x USB-A, HDMI 2.1 (TMDS), 3.5mm audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.2—
Webcam720p HD—
BiometricsNoneFingerprint reader in the power button

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MECHREVO Wujie 14 Max
Operating systemWindows 11—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup