Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) vs GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
64.1Inno Score
VS
GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
63.5Inno Score
63.5chipPerformance64.9
55Display55.5
86.7Battery98.7
50.3Portability29
2 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)4 spec wins — GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) scores 64.1 against 63.5 for GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025). Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) edges ahead in portability, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

  • Stronger portability score: 50 vs 29
  • 40% lower thickness: 17.9 mm vs 29.9 mm
  • 12% lower weight: 2.2 kg vs 2.5 kg

Reasons to pick the GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)

  • Stronger battery score: 99 vs 87
  • 100% higher storage: 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
  • 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
  • 18% higher charging: 330 W vs 280 W
  • 10% higher capacity: 99 Wh vs 90 Wh

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB, G-SyncOLED (G-SYNC, 100% DCI-P3)
Resolution2560x16002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz240 Hz+45%
Peak brightness—500 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24C/24T, up to 5.4GHz)Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 115W (8GB GDDR7)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop GPU (24GB GDDR7, 175W)
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB)DDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage1,024 GB2,048 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2x M.2 slots)PCIe Gen4 NVMe M.2 SSD (two M.2 slots, one PCIe Gen5)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,046Top 18%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—19,299Top 15%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
Capacity90 Wh99 Wh+10%
Charging280 W330 W+18%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
Weight2.2 kg+12%2.5 kg
Thickness17.9 mm+40%29.9 mm
MaterialAluminum lid, MIL-STD-810H testedMostly plastic chassis (Dark Tide black)

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
Ports1x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery / G-SYNC), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack1x USB-C Thunderbolt 5 (USB4, DisplayPort 2.1, PD 3.0), 1x USB-C Thunderbolt 4 (USB4, DisplayPort 1.4, PD 3.0), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1, 1 Gbps RJ-45 Ethernet, microSD (UHS-II), 3.5mm headphone/mic combo, DC-in
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be)
Bluetooth5.45.4
Webcam1080p FHD IR camera1080p FHD IR webcam with array microphone
BiometricsIR camera with Windows Hello face recognitionIR face recognition (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)GIGABYTE AORUS MASTER 16 AM6H (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home or Pro (depending on SKU)

Related comparisons

Try another matchup