Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1610

Apple A14 Bionic
46.9Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
46CPU30.7
35.1GPU—
53.6Benchmarks—
41.1AIspec-based—
63.2Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic

  • Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 31
  • 25% higher Max clock: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Apple A14 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Announced20202026
Process5 nm—
TDP (typical)6 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.4—

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A14 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Cores68+33%
Core configuration2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz2 + 6
Max clock3 GHz+25%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A14 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
GPUApple GPU (4-core)Mali-G68

AI

AI comparison: Apple A14 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
NPU16-core Neural Engine—
AI performance11 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A14 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR4X-4266—
Max bandwidth34.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A14 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
ModemExternal (Snapdragon X55)—
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.3

Media

Media comparison: Apple A14 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Video capture4K@60fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A14 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A14 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu950,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,080Top 19%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,900Top 27%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,050Top 50%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup