Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200

WINNER
Apple A16 Bionic
54.1Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 2200
41.9Inno Score
56.5CPU34.3
41GPU31
54.8Benchmarks48.7
52.7AI0
71.4Efficiency66.5
6 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200

InnoReviews verdict

Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 54.1 to 41.9, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+53) and CPU (+22). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic

  • Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 34
  • Stronger GPU score: 41 vs 31
  • Stronger benchmarks score: 55 vs 49
  • Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 67
  • 64% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 1,600

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200

  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
Announced20222022
Process4 nm4 nm
TDP (typical)7 W+22%9 W
ArchitectureArmv8.6Armv9

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
Cores68+33%
Core configuration2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510
Max clock3.46 GHz+24%2.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
GPUApple GPU (5-core)Samsung Xclipse 920

AI

AI comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
NPU16-core Neural EngineSamsung NPU
AI performance17 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
Memory typeLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5
Max bandwidth51.2 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
ModemExternal (Snapdragon X65)Integrated Exynos 5G modem

Media

Media comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
Video capture4K@60fps8K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
AnTuTu 101,300,000+18%1,100,000
Geekbench 6 (single)2,620+64%1,600
Geekbench 6 (multi)6,570+58%4,150
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,100+48%2,100

Related comparisons

Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Google Tensor G3VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VS

Try another matchup