Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200

WINNER
Apple A16 Bionic
56.2Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 2200
46.8Inno Score
56.8CPU39.3
43.7GPU35.5
61.5Benchmarks57.3
52.7AI—
71.4Efficiency66.5
6 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200

InnoReviews verdict

Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 46.8, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+18) and GPU (+8). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic

  • Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 39
  • Stronger GPU score: 44 vs 36
  • Stronger benchmarks score: 62 vs 57
  • Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 67
  • 64% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 1,600

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200

  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
Announced20222022
Process4 nm4 nm
TDP (typical)7 W+22%9 W
ArchitectureArmv8.6Armv9

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
Cores68+33%
Core configuration2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510
Max clock3.46 GHz+24%2.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
GPUApple GPU (5-core)Samsung Xclipse 920

AI

AI comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
NPU16-core Neural EngineSamsung NPU
AI performance17 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
Memory typeLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5
Max bandwidth51.2 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
ModemExternal (Snapdragon X65)Integrated Exynos 5G modem

Media

Media comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
Video capture4K@60fps8K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2200
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2200
AnTuTu 101,300,000+18%Top 23%1,100,000Top 28%
Geekbench 6 (single)2,620+64%Top 11%1,600Top 27%
Geekbench 6 (multi)6,570+58%Top 15%4,150Top 30%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,100+48%Top 36%2,100Top 51%

Related comparisons

Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

Try another matchup