Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2400
62.7CPU51.7
47.8GPU49.4
64.2Benchmarks71.2
72AI—
79.6Efficiency66.5
5 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A17 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 62.7 to 57.9, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+13) and CPU (+11). Samsung Exynos 2400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 52
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 67
- 37% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 2,150
- 25% lower process: 3 nm vs 4 nm
- 18% higher Max clock: 3.78 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 64
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
- 32% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 1,450,000
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+18% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000Top 20% | 1,914,857+32%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+37%Top 8% | 2,150Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250+10%Top 12% | 6,600Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600Top 27% | 3,800+6%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

